'Your honor," he said, "my client agrees that she has a fine piece of property, that he did rent such property......... and a degree of pleasure was derived from the transaction.
However, my client found a well on the property around which he placed his own stones, sunk a shaft, and erected a pump, all labor performed personally by him.
We claim these improvements were sufficient to offset the unpaid amount. We, therefore, ask that judgment not be granted."
Good arguement, isn't it?
Malay version
Peguam defendan telah terkejut dengan cara kes itu di persembahkan. Pertahanan nya adalah .....
'Kehormatan anda, katanya,.... klien saya bersetuju bahawa dia mempunyai sekeping harta, bahawa dia telah menyewa harta itu ......... dan ijazah keseronokan yang diperoleh daripada urus niaga. Walau bagaimanapun, pelanggan saya mendapati telaga ke atas harta di sekeliling mana dia meletakkan batu sendiri, tenggelam aci, dan didirikan pam, semua buruh dilakukan sendiri oleh beliau.
Kita menuntut pembaikan ini adalah mencukupi untuk mengimbangi amaun yang belum dibayar. Oleh itu, kami minta bahawa penghakiman tidak boleh diberi. "
Arguement baik, kan?
No comments:
Post a Comment